Wednesday, March 20, 2013

802.11ac Channel Planning

The forthcoming 802.11ac Gigabit Wi-Fi amendment will bring with it support for larger channels at 80 MHz and 160 MHz widths. This is one of the primary drivers behind the increased peak performance and bandwidth of wireless APs and clients. Therefore, careful consideration of channel widths allowed on APs and the channel plan for WLAN deployments must be made prior to an enterprise deployment.

Channel Numbering
First, let's tackle how channels are numbered and referenced in 802.11ac. The standard method to denote 5 GHz channels has been to always use the 20 MHz center channel frequencies for both 20 MHz and 40 MHz wide channels. Starting with 802.11n, 40 MHz channels were referenced as the primary 20 MHz channel plus an extension channel either above or below the primary channel. An example would be a 40 MHz channel consisting of channel 36 (primary) + 40 (extension above).

802.11ac changes how we reference larger channel widths. Instead of continuing to reference the 20 MHz extension channel(s), we will now reference the center channel frequency for the entire 20, 40, 80 or 160 MHz wide channel.

The valid channel numbers for various channel widths are:

Channel Width Valid Channel Numbers
20 MHz 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 100, 104, 108, 112, 116,
120, 124, 128, 132, 136, 140, 144, 149, 153, 161, 165, 169
40 MHz 38, 46, 54, 62, 102, 110, 118, 126, 134, 142, 151, 159
80 MHz 42, 58, 106, 122, 138, 155
160 MHz 50, 114

This results in channel numbers that may look unfamiliar to most WLAN administrators. Simply remember that channel numbers increment by one for every 5 MHz increase in frequency. This will probably be easier to reference through a graphic for most people. In the graphic below, identify the center of each 80 MHz and 160 MHz channel block, follow it up to the 20 MHz IEEE channel numbers, then split the difference between the two 20 MHz channel numbers that it falls between. For example, the 80 MHz channel block in UNII-1 is centered between channels 40 and 44; splitting the difference gives us channel 42.

5 GHz Channels, with DFS and TDWR Restrictions
Non-Overlapping Channels
As I previously detailed in my post on the impact of 802.11ac on enterprise networks, these wide channel widths may not be realistic to use in an enterprise environment where multiple access points are deployed on non-overlapping channels and co-channel interference must be minimized. To recap:
  • 80 MHz wide channels allow for five (5) non-overlapping channels in the U.S. and five (5) in the UK/EU (channels 149 and higher require light licensing for outdoor use only) when DFS is used, but only two (2) channels in the U.S. and one (1) in UK/EU without DFS.
  • 160 MHz wide channels allow for one (1) non-overlapping channel in the U.S. and two (2) in the UK/EU, with DFS being mandatory for their use in all circumstances.
Note - In the U.S. channels 120-128 are prohibited due to TDWR restrictions, and in the UK/EU channels in Band C (equivalent to UNII-3) require "light" licensing an are restricted to outdoor use.

I'm purposely going to skip the 160 MHz wide channels that are possible using 80+80 MHz discontiguous channels for simplicity at this point.

It's clear that 80 MHz channels will be hard to implement in an enterprise setting that requires high capacity due to issues with channel re-use and minimizing co-channel interference. Even when DFS is used, only 4 or 5 non-overlapping channels will be available. And forget about using 160 MHz channels in the enterprise... leave those for home use where only one AP will be deployed (and hopefully you're neighbors don't live too close to cause interference)!

However, it's not quite as dire a situation as that. There is a saving grace that will allow enterprises to take advantage of these wider channels on a "best-effort" basis. Let's step back for a moment - with 802.11n, 40 MHz channels were an all-or-nothing proposition. The APs channel width was statically set at 20 or 40 MHz.  On the other hand, 802.11ac allows per-frame channel width and bandwidth signaling. Practically, this means that WLAN administrators can allow the use of wider channels by APs and clients when all of the constituent smaller channels are clear. If a portion of the large channel is busy at the point in time when a frame needs to be transmitted, for instance a neighboring AP or WLAN is actively using a 20 or 40 MHz portion, then the AP or client can simply back down and use the primary 20 or 40 MHz portion of the larger channel that is clear. For the next frame transmission, if the entire 80/160 MHz channel is clear then the AP or client can ramp back up and use the full channel width.

Critical to this dynamic per-frame channel width procedure is the notion of the primary and secondary channels. The WLAN administrator must designate which 20 MHz segment within a 40, 80, or 160 MHz wide channel is the primary 20 MHz channel. This channel forms the core frequency segment that the BSS (basic service set) or AP radio operates on. Based on the channel blocks depicted in the table above, the BSS will then automatically designate the primary 40 MHz and primary 80 MHz channels by extending the primary 20 MHz channel (moving downward through the table). Only the 40 MHz and 80 MHz channels pictured in the table are allowed. For example primary 20 MHz channel 56 can only be expanded into 40 MHz channel 54 (combining channel 56 and 52); combination with channel 60 is not allowed. For easy reference, just use the channels as depicted :)

802.11ac Primary and Secondary Channels
(Image from 802.11ac: A Survival Guide)

For example, consider a 160 MHz channel in UNII-1 / UNII-2 where the WLAN admin has selected channel 60 as the primary 20 MHz channel. The primary 40 MHz channel will be 62, and the primary 80 MHz channel will be 58. If any portion of the secondary 80 MHz channel (ch42) is busy then the frame can use the primary 80 MHz channel (ch58). If any portion of the secondary 40 MHz channel (ch54) is busy then the frame can use the primary 40 MHz channel (ch62). And if any portion of the secondary 20 MHz channel (ch64) is busy then the frame can use the primary 20 MHz channel (ch60). This allows an AP or client to dynamically fallback to narrower channel widths in the presence of co-channel interference or noise that only affects a portion of the larger channel.

This has some interesting implications for channel planning!

Developing a Channel Plan
Since eliminating co-channel interference is one of the main objectives in designing a WLAN channel plan, you'll want to carefully consider how you select the operating channel width and primary 20 MHz channels for APs in order to avoid co-channel interference.

First, determine if DFS channels can be used in your environment based on proximity to radar systems and client device support. DFS client support with 802.11a/n has been spotty at best. Hopefully 802.11ac clients will support DFS channels since 5 GHz support is mandated by the amendment and the FCC has eased DFS band adoption by clients since they no longer have to implement radar detection if they passively scan (listen-only) for an AP before transmitting any frames. In essence, they are relying on the AP to perform the radar detection and begin operating on a DFS channel if allowed. But until the time comes when a majority of clients support DFS channels, administrators must verify what channels the client devices on their network support so they don't cause coverage holes by having APs operate on channels that clients can't use.

Second, determine the channel width that you want to attempt to "guarantee" to client devices, which needs to be free of co-channel interference as much as possible. This needs to be based on the density of your AP deployment as well as client device capabilities. Remember - 802.11ac certified clients must support 80 MHz channel width, while 160 MHz channel width is optional. The key is to ensure that every AP has fewer neighboring APs within radio range than non-overlapping channels available.
  • In high-density areas, this should be 20 MHz (stadiums, large event centers, urban areas with many neighboring WLANs, etc.).
  • In normal-density areas, this is likely to be 40 MHz channels (large building office space). 
  • In low-density areas this could be 80 MHz channels (small buildings, few neighbors, etc.).  
  • In single-AP areas, this could be 160 MHz channels (such as homes or very small offices).

Third, make a list of the acceptable primary 20 MHz channels that results in non-overlapping channels at the "guaranteed" channel width. This will maximize the likelihood of transmitting at the wider channel width without causing interference with other APs. For example, if attempting to guarantee non-overlapping 80 MHz channels, limit the allowed subset of primary 20 MHz channels to 36, 52, 100, 116, 132, and 149. The specific 20 MHz channels could be different than I have listed in this example, but the key point is that only ONE primary 20 MHz channel be allowed within each "guaranteed" wider channel width.

Finally, channels will be configured by WLAN administrators in two steps:
  1. Select a channel width (20, 40, 80, 160 MHz) for AP or WLAN operation
    This should be the "guaranteed" channel width, at minimum. It could be larger than the "guaranteed" channel width if you want to allow APs and clients to achieve higher peak performance when the network is fairly idle. Since this can be done on a per-frame basis and clear-channel assessment is performed prior to transmission, allowing dynamic use of wider bandwidth shouldn't result in significantly more collisions. But it will result in more co-channel interference (sharing of bandwidth) between neighboring APs. The exact impact of per-frame channel width and co-channel interference in a multi-AP environment will require more in-depth testing once 802.11ac equipment is released. I would stick with using the "guaranteed" channel width until you are able to test in your own environment.

  2. Assign the primary 20 MHz channel to each AP (or allow auto-assignment)
    The primary 40 MHz and 80 MHz channels will be determined automatically based on the primary 20 MHz channel selected. If "Auto" channel planning is used, which is common in enterprise WLAN equipment, ensure the subset of primary 20 MHz channels allowed to be assigned to APs is limited to those in your list.
Final Thoughts
802.11ac offers exciting prospects for "Gigabit" Wi-Fi. However, most of the benefit of the first wave of products centers around the use of ever-wider channels. Two barriers to the use of these wider channels exist for enterprise WLANs:
  1. Limited spectrum, resulting in insufficient channels to facilitate a re-use plan that effectively allows wider channels without excessive co-channel interference.
  2. Greater reliance on DFS channels to provide more spectrum and channels, which many Wi-Fi clients do not support today.
Luckily, the engineers designing 802.11ac learned from 802.11n's shortcomings and devised a clever method to minimize co-channel interference through per-frame channel width adaptation and the designation of primary channels. This presents a fundamental shift in how administrators should approach WLAN channel planning. Administrators should be careful in selecting primary 20 MHz channels that result in non-overlapping channels at the larger channel widths that they wish to use in their environments. Also, a heavier reliance on DFS channels is required to realize the benefits that 802.11ac has to offer in an enterprise environment. Enterprises will need to evaluate what devices are in use on their WLANs to determine if 5 GHz DFS channel use is feasible. This can be especially problematic with personal devices where the organization has little control over the devices being used. However, consumer device lifecycles are typically shorter than enterprise lifecycles, so the adoption of 802.11ac capable client devices should occur relatively quickly (~2 years).

From an implementation perspective, most enterprises should plan around non-overlapping 40 MHz channels, or even 20 MHz channels in high-density areas. If the FCC frees up an additional 195 MHz of shared spectrum in late 2014 or early 2015 then designing around non-overlapping 80 MHz channels (or possibly even 160 MHz channels) in the U.S. will become much more practical.

Cheers,
Andrew


802.11ac Gigabit Wi-Fi Series:

11 comments:

  1. Nice stuff,You are right 802.11ac have more bandwidth then others because nowadays every type of applications demand more bandwidth.

    ReplyDelete
  2. With more available bandwidth, you may not have to pack AP's as densely to accommodate the same number of clients. However, you still may need to manage it for coverage reasons.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Andrew,

    This is a STELLAR blog amigo! Well done.

    What are your thoughts on how the power of transmissions will change dynamically with per-frame channel width changes? Restated, do we yet know if the chipsets will keep the power the same for the 20MHz Tx and the 40MHz Tx or if the power will be cut in half for the 40MHz Tx...and then half again for the 80MHz Tx (due to power density in the band)? If the power is dynamically changing like that (per-frame), wouldn't that cause unbalanced links on a per-frame basis necessitating design around worst-case scenarios?

    Thanks for the great blog and for any feedback on my question.

    Devinator

    ReplyDelete
  4. Are legacy clients going to be able to take advantage of the 40 MHz channel sizes they can use now? From what I understand above the mechanism by which channels are dynamically sized will be based on communication between the AP and client. If 802.11ac only does 40 MHz and larger channel sizes in a dynamic fashion, does that mean 802.11n and previous clients are now limited to using static channel sizes and therefor only 20 MHz widths?

    Or, is there still going to be a way to setup fixed 40 MHz wide channels?

    Thanks for the great info.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Scott,
      Yes, the operation of 802.11n clients and interaction with the AP will not change. Backwards compatible as usual in the Wi-Fi world. Only newer 802.11ac clients will be able to recognize the per-frame channel width capabilities and use them.

      So, 802.11n clients can still use 20 MHz and 40 MHz channel sizes, but can't change channel width on a per-frame basis like 802.11ac client can. This might cause some slight difference in co-channel interference for 11n clients compared to 11ac clients since 11n can't back down to a 20 MHz channel dynamically. For instance, 11n clients might see one 20 MHz portion BUSY and defer transmission whereas an 11ac client on the same AP can actually back-down to a 20 MHz channel and transmit their frame. The net result will be a little bit better performance and lower access latency for 11ac clients. But if you design around non-overlapping 40 MHz channels, have sufficient 40 MHz channels to minimize co-channel interference, and have a good RF design this difference should be minimal.

      Cheers,
      Andrew

      Delete
    2. This is an excellent write up Andrew. I am glad you addressed some of the enterprise implications.

      Delete
  5. It would help if the FCC actually knew something about Digital Communication technology. In future it would be wise to consult with your Japanese counterparts instead of considering yourself as designers and superior to the electronic engineers which you are not!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I was confused about what the author was trying to say, given that he's not an electronic engineers guy, but Mah really cleared it up for me with that comment. From now on, I will only consult with my Japanese counterparts, and the FCC shall getting nothing but my raging scorns for not knowings about Digital Communication technology.

      Delete
  6. Hi Andrew.
    I am still confused about channels 120,124 and 128, Which document from FCC forbids the use of those channels if DFS is supported on the AP?

    The only "new" document I have found is this FCC DA-12-459A1 which only describes precautions to take before a deployment.

    Losing those three permanently altogether for Laptops with ac will be problematic in design.

    Cheers Martin.

    PS. Thanks for the good presentation in Austin.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Martin,
      The FCC banned use of the 5600-5650 MHz range in 2010:
      http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/uniitdwr.pdf

      They have since allowed its use again in 2014:
      http://www.revolutionwifi.net/2014/04/impact-of-fcc-5-ghz-u-nii-report-order.html

      Cheers,
      Andrew

      Delete